|
Vol: 61(75) No: 1 / March 2016 The Common Ontology for Service Infrastructure Development over Cooperative Domains - The Foundation of Architectural Design, Urban Planning and Construction Engineering Data Repository Model Ana Perisic Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia, e-mail: anaperisic@uns.ac.rs Marko Lazic Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia, e-mail: arhitektura@live.com Branko Perišic Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia, e-mail: perisic@uns.ac.rs Keywords: architectural design; building information modeling; computer supported cooperative work; construction engineering; data repository modeling; ontology; service oriented architecture; urban planning Abstract Particular domain expertise in engineering and scientific fields has emerged demanding more sophisticated computer support for cooperative development of complex engineering artifacts. For the effective implementation of Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm in highly interoperable domains the existence of suitable infrastructure is essential. Combined together, Architectural Design, Urban Planning and Construction Engineering highly influence the development process of contemporary and future engineering methods, standards and tools in overall Environment Engineering. The essential role of Architectural Design (AD) and Urban Planning (UP) is to enable forward looking approach to the building facility, while Construction Engineering (CE) expresses its routine through the transformation of abstract ideas to usable urban artifacts. Currently available software tools, supporting AD, UP and CE domains are far from being simple and ultimately demand advanced skills development. In this article we discuss the ontology aspects of SOA based support for the development of cooperative infrastructure over common data repository. The Abstract Space concept is defined as the ontology core. References [1] Bryant, B. R., Gray, J., Mernik, M., Clarke, P. J., France, R. B., Karsai, G.: Challenges and Directions in Formalizing the Semantics of Modeling Languages. ComSIS Vol. 8, No. 2, 225-253. (2011) [2] Kramer, M., Ludlow D., Khan, Z.: Domain-specific languages for agile urban policy modelling, Proceedings 27th European Conference on Modeling and Simulation, May 2013, Norway. (2013) [3] Branko Perisic, Ana Perisic, Marko Lazic: \"The Broker Solution Example of Domain Specific Languages Orchestration Framework\", ERK 2014, IEEE Conference, Portoroz, Slovenia, September 2014. [4] Schmidt K. and Wagner I. (2004): Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 13, no. 5-6, pp. 349–408. [5] Tory Melanie, Sheryl Staub-French, Barry A. Po & Fuqu Wu (2008): Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design, Springer, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW):The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 17, pp. 311–351. [6] Bilal Succar (2009): Building information modeling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders, Elsevier Automation in Construction (2009), Vol. 18, pp. 357–375. [7] Sungyol Song, Jeongsam Yang, Namhyuk Kim (2012): Development of BIM-based structural framework optimization and simulation system for building construction, Elsevier Computers in Industry, Vol. 63, pp. 895–912. [8] Cerovsek Tomo (2011): A review and outlook of a ‘Building Information Model’ (BIM): A multi-standpoint framework for technological development, Elsevier Advanced Engineering Informatics (2011), Vol. 25, pp. 224–244. [9] Vishal Sing, Ningu Gu, Xinagyu Wang (2011): A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform, Elsevier Automation in Construction, Vol. 20, pp. 134–144. [10] Youngsoo Jung and Mihee Joo (2011): Building information modeling (BIM) framework for practical implementation, Elsevier Automation in Construction, Vol. 20, pp. 126–133. [11] Gartner, Service Oriented Scenario, https://www.gartner.com/doc/391595/serviceoriented-architecture-scenario (on line Accessed january 2015). [12] Srikanth Seshadri, JavaWorld (Jan 17, 2007 12:00 AM PT), On line, http://www.networkworld.com/article/2293672/software/soa--understanding-the-architecture.html (Accessed on January 2015). [13] Weiming Shen, Qi Hao, Helium Mak, Joseph Neelamkavil, Helen Xie, John Dickinson, Russ Thomas, Ajit Pardasani, Henry Xue (2010): Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction and facility management: A review, Elsevier Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 24, pp. 196–207. [14] Patel, S., Sheth, A. (2001): Planning and optimizing semantic information requests using domain modeling and resource characteristics. Sixth International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, CoopIS 2001, pp. 135-149. [15] Werner, S., Long, P. (2003): Cognition Meets Le Corbusier – Cognitive Principles of Architectural Design. In: Freksa, C. et al. (Eds.): Spatial Cognition III, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 112–126. [16] Saeid Amir M. Mahmoodi (2001): The Design Process in Architecture, A Pedagogical Approach Using Interactive Thinking, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, School of Civil Engineering, United Kingdom. [17] Patsucha, S., Glodney, B., Carol, C., Nameth, J., Sampson, and S. (2011): Urban Design Principles, Gensler, City of Los Angeles, [Online]. Available: http://www.urbandesignla.com/resources/docs/DesigningAHealthyLA/hi/DesigningAHealthyLA.pdf (current October 2014) [18] Simmonds, D., Waddell, P., Wegener, and M. (2011): Equilibrium versus dynamics in urban modeling, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol 40, No. 6. [19] Kramer, M., Ludlow D., Khan, and Z. (2013): Domain-specific languages for agile urban policy modeling, Proceedings 27th European Conference on Modeling and Simulation, May 2013, Norway. [20] Liu, Y., and Phinn, S.R. (2003): Modeling urban development with cellular automata incorporating fuzzy-set approaches, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 637–658. [21] Raza A. (2001): Object-Oriented Temporal GIS for Urban Applications, Ph.D. Thesis , University of Twente and ITC. [22] Guarino, N. (1998): Formal Ontology and Information Systems, Proceedings of FOIS’98, Trento, Italy, 6-8 June 1998. Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 3-15. [23] Bryant, B. R., Gray, J., Mernik, M., Clarke, P. J., France, R. B., Karsai, G.: Challenges and Directions in Formalizing the Semantics of Modeling Languages, Computer Science and Information Systems, ComSIS, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 225-253. [24] Perisic Ana, \"The Open Conceptual Model of Space and Urban Block for analysis and parametric valorization of Urban Blocks\", PhD thesis under review, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 2015. [25] Open Geospatial Consortium. OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard, (2012). [Online]. Available (current March 2015): http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml. [26] Čeh, I., Črepinšek, M., Kosar, T., Mernik, M.: Ontology Driven Development of Domain-Specific Languages, ComSIS Vol. 8, No. 2, 317-342, 2011. |